Hotel Agreements 101
Management, lease, franchise and hybrid agreements explained for owners.
Read →How a hotel operator is paid — pre-opening, base, incentive, and the reimbursables
A companion to Paper No. 01, Hotel Agreements 101.
“An operator is paid once to create revenue, and again to convert it to profit.”
The whole craft of the fee lies in that second payment — and in the reimbursables that sit quietly beneath both.
Before the doors open, the operator earns under two separate agreements — one for technical assistance, one for pre-opening management. Both matter, and an owner new to the business routinely underestimates what each involves.
This covers the operator's consulting role in the design and planning of the hotel — architecture, interior design and lighting, mechanical systems, kitchen and food-facility layout, and matters such as energy, security and financing. Some operators require that their brand standards be met in the design, and will certify that the owner's drawings conform.
The fee turns on the services required, the hours the operator's people put in, the stage at which they join, and the complexity of the project. Branded operators typically charge between $100,000 and $500,000; independents, between $50,000 and $250,000.
This covers everything the operator does before the hotel trades: writing the pre-opening plan and budget, and then running the pre-opening itself — staffing, training, installing systems, marketing the property, procuring supplies and inventories, and negotiating leases and service contracts in the owner's name. Because the first years set the trajectory, the quality of this work is decisive.
Pre-opening budgets — the management fee included — run roughly $1,500 to $5,500 per room, or 1.5–2.5% of total project cost. The management fee itself falls between $100,000 and $200,000, depending on size, service level and the length of the run-up. Usually 10% is paid on signing and the balance in equal instalments across the period; a delayed opening ordinarily triggers further payments.
Two ideas sit behind the operator's fee: the base fee, paid to generate revenue, and the incentive fee, paid to produce profit.
The base fee is a percentage of the hotel's gross revenues — net of sales and occupancy taxes. Its logic is to reward the operator for filling the house. It takes several shapes.
A percentage of revenue, or a fixed sum. It gives the operator little or no reason to protect profit, and is rare — found where an owner-affiliated company manages the hotel, where the owner has no bargaining power, or where the owner deliberately does not want a reported profit.
The operator earns the incentive on top of the base, and so has a real reason to produce profit. This is the structure of most arm's-length agreements. The split once ran about two-thirds base to one-third incentive; the weight has been shifting toward the incentive, and operators who accept that shift generally earn more overall — because they take on more of the risk.
This sharpens the incentive only where the incentive fee might genuinely exceed the base. Operators seek it when a hotel's future is uncertain, or its history unreliable; it usually gives way to a base-plus-incentive structure once a track record exists.
Rare by count, but common in parts of the world — notably the Middle East and North Africa. It gives the operator every reason to produce cash flow, but risks paying nothing even when weak results lie outside the operator's control. Operators are, understandably, reluctant.
In the owner's ideal, the fee follows profit alone, and the risk sits with the operator. In the operator's ideal, the fee follows revenue alone, and it is paid for its marketing skill without taking business risk. The real world sits between the two — which is why base-plus-incentive prevails.
Usually a percentage of gross revenue, shaped by two things: location and level of service. Select-service hotels, which need less management, run 3–5% with a modest incentive; full-service hotels lower the base and lean on the incentive. Base fees run a little lower in Asia — around 2–2.5% — than in the Americas and EMEA, around 3–3.5%. A base fee can also be a flat annual sum, common for a distressed hotel where the operator wants a floor: a fixed base, coupled with an incentive once cash flows clear a threshold, guarantees a minimum while rewarding a fast recovery.
The incentive fee is the heart of every management-agreement negotiation, and it is always tied to the operator's ability to deliver profit or cash flow. Two structures dominate.
IBNOIE — once called “adjusted GOP” — is gross operating profit after the base fee. A fee on IBNOIE rewards the operator for managing what it actually controls: all revenue, and all cost above the GOP line, leaving the owner responsible for the non-operating items — rents, property tax, insurance, land rent. The fee runs 6–10% of IBNOIE, often with a step-up tied to the GOP margin.
For a house expected to run a 32% GOP margin, a schedule might read:
— paying the operator more for a better result.
A more recent idea. From EBITDA, deduct the replacement reserve and an owner's priority — a negotiated percentage of the owner's total investment. What remains is cash flow after owner's priority (CFAOP), and the fee is a percentage of it, from 15% up to 50%, depending on structure. The negotiation turns on two numbers: the fee percentage, and the owner's priority, the latter usually 6–12% of the purchase price.
In effect, the operator's incentive is subordinated until the owner has earned a minimum return. Because of that subordination, a CFAOP fee is always larger than the equivalent GOP fee — as it should be: if the operator agrees to wait until the owner is paid, it is fair to pay it to wait. A low priority — say 6% — yields the operator a smaller share of CFAOP; a high one — say 10% — a larger share.
There was once a third structure — cash flow after debt service (CFADS) — which fell out of use because refinancing raised the debt service and cut the operator's fee, punishing good performance. And for a distressed hotel, the fee is usually set on the improvement in GOP — often 15–25% of the change, for a set period until the hotel stabilises or is sold — tying the reward directly to the turnaround.
Finally, the waterfall. Earning a fee and being paid it need not rest on the same measure. Where an owner wants the fee based on CFAOP and the operator wants it on IBNOIE, a waterfall can compromise: the fee is set on IBNOIE, but part of it — say half — is subordinated to a specified CFAOP.
Beyond the base and incentive fees, the owner reimburses the operator for system-wide services delivered in support of the property. For a branded operator these include:
Independent operators offer these too, but usually less comprehensively than the chains.
Two disputes recur. The first is over which of the operator's corporate costs may fairly be billed to a hotel — what the base and incentive fees already cover, and what may be charged on top. The courts' rule is plain: if the agreement permits the charge, it stands; if not, it does not. The second is over how system-wide costs — technology above all — are apportioned across the hotels in the system.
Every agreement should state exactly which of the operator's costs are reimbursable and which are not, make disputes subject to arbitration, and provide for an annual, independent verification of the operator's total reimbursables and their pro-rata allocation. And because operators use different formats and formulas, an owner must normalise them before any fair, side-by-side comparison can be made.
“The base buys revenue; the incentive buys profit; the reimbursable buys reach. Each should be measured against what it returns.”
Read next
Management, lease, franchise and hybrid agreements explained for owners.
Read →Osterwalder’s nine building blocks, worked for a luxury hospitality platform.
Read →The contents of the Excelsior Compendium, three volumes on owner-side hotel asset management.
Read →Contact
Tell us the hotel, the question and the date by which you need an answer. Accounts are read only under a signed non-disclosure agreement.